0.00/0.01 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.02 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.03/0.30 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu 0.03/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.03/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.03/0.30 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.03/0.30 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.03/0.30 % CPULimit : 1440 0.03/0.30 % WCLimit : 180 0.03/0.30 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 11:44:03 UTC 2026 0.03/0.30 % CPUTime : 0.03/0.30 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.03/0.32 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.06/0.33 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gGjvoTh94i/E---3.1_1972966.p 0.06/0.34 % Version: 3.5.1-ho 0.06/0.34 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNHSN. 0.06/0.34 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.06/0.34 % Starting new_ho_9 with 900s (5) cores 0.06/0.34 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores 0.06/0.34 % Starting sh1l with 180s (1) cores 0.06/0.34 % Starting post_as_ho10 with 180s (1) cores 0.06/0.34 % post_as_ho1 with pid 1972980 completed with status 0 0.06/0.34 % Result found by post_as_ho1 0.06/0.34 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNHSN. 0.06/0.34 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.06/0.34 % Starting new_ho_9 with 900s (5) cores 0.06/0.34 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores 0.06/0.34 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) 0.06/0.34 % No SInE strategy applied 0.06/0.34 % Search class: HGHSF-FFSM33-SHSSMFNN 0.06/0.34 % partial match(3): HGHNF-FFSM00-SHSSMFNN 0.06/0.34 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.06/0.34 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores 0.06/0.34 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1972985 completed with status 0 0.06/0.34 % Result found by SubtermCWHack 0.06/0.34 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMLSNHSN. 0.06/0.34 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.06/0.34 % Starting new_ho_9 with 900s (5) cores 0.06/0.34 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores 0.06/0.34 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) 0.06/0.34 % No SInE strategy applied 0.06/0.34 % Search class: HGHSF-FFSM33-SHSSMFNN 0.06/0.34 % partial match(3): HGHNF-FFSM00-SHSSMFNN 0.06/0.34 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.06/0.34 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores 0.06/0.34 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.06/0.34 0.06/0.34 % Proof found! 0.06/0.34 % SZS status Theorem 0.06/0.34 % SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.06/0.34 thf(decl_28, type, union: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.06/0.34 thf(decl_37, type, fun_image: ($i > $i) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.06/0.34 thf(decl_45, type, epred1_0: $i > $o). 0.06/0.34 thf(decl_46, type, epred2_0: $i > $o). 0.06/0.34 thf(decl_47, type, esk1_0: $i > $i). 0.06/0.34 thf(decl_48, type, esk2_0: $i). 0.06/0.34 thf(decl_49, type, esk3_0: $i). 0.06/0.34 thf(decl_50, type, esk4_0: $i). 0.06/0.34 thf(decl_51, type, esk5_0: $i). 0.06/0.34 thf(thm, conjecture, ![X27:$i > $o, X28:$i > $o, X22:$i > $i]:(((fun_image @ X22 @ (union @ X27 @ X28))=(union @ (fun_image @ X22 @ X27) @ (fun_image @ X22 @ X28)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gGjvoTh94i/E---3.1_1972966.p', thm)). 0.06/0.34 thf(union, axiom, ((union)=(^[X5:$i > $o, X6:$i > $o, X4:$i]:((((X5 @ X4))|((X6 @ X4)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gGjvoTh94i/E---3.1_1972966.p', union)). 0.06/0.34 thf(fun_image, axiom, ((fun_image)=(^[X22:$i > $i, X23:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(?[X1:$i]:((((X23 @ X1))&(((X3)=(X22 @ X1)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gGjvoTh94i/E---3.1_1972966.p', fun_image)). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~(![X27:$i > $o, X28:$i > $o, X22:$i > $i]:(((fun_image @ X22 @ (union @ X27 @ X28))=(union @ (fun_image @ X22 @ X27) @ (fun_image @ X22 @ X28))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_4, plain, ((union)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((((Z0 @ Z2))|((Z1 @ Z2)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[union])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_5, plain, ((fun_image)=(^[Z0:$i > $i, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(?[X1:$i]:((((Z1 @ X1))&(((Z2)=(Z0 @ X1)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fun_image])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~(![X27:$i > $o, X28:$i > $o, X22:$i > $i, X42:$i]:((?[X36:$i]:((((X27 @ X36)|(X28 @ X36))&((X42)=(X22 @ X36))))<=>(?[X37:$i]:(((X27 @ X37)&((X42)=(X22 @ X37))))|?[X38:$i]:(((X28 @ X38)&((X42)=(X22 @ X38)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4]), c_0_5])])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X50:$i, X51:$i, X52:$i]:(((((~(epred1_0 @ X51)|((esk2_0)!=(esk1_0 @ X51))|(~(epred1_0 @ X50)|((esk2_0)!=(esk1_0 @ X50))))&(~(epred2_0 @ X52)|((esk2_0)!=(esk1_0 @ X52))|(~(epred1_0 @ X50)|((esk2_0)!=(esk1_0 @ X50)))))&((~(epred1_0 @ X51)|((esk2_0)!=(esk1_0 @ X51))|(~(epred2_0 @ X50)|((esk2_0)!=(esk1_0 @ X50))))&(~(epred2_0 @ X52)|((esk2_0)!=(esk1_0 @ X52))|(~(epred2_0 @ X50)|((esk2_0)!=(esk1_0 @ X50))))))&(((((epred2_0 @ esk5_0)|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0)|((epred1_0 @ esk3_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk3_0)))&(((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk5_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0)|((epred1_0 @ esk3_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk3_0))))&(((epred2_0 @ esk5_0)|((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk4_0))|((epred1_0 @ esk3_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk3_0)))&(((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk5_0))|((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk4_0))|((epred1_0 @ esk3_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk3_0)))))&((((epred2_0 @ esk5_0)|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0)|((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk3_0)))&(((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk5_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0)|((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk3_0))))&(((epred2_0 @ esk5_0)|((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk4_0))|((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk3_0)))&(((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk5_0))|((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk4_0))|((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk3_0)))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i]:((~((epred1_0 @ X1))|((esk2_0)!=(esk1_0 @ X1))|~((epred1_0 @ X3))|((esk2_0)!=(esk1_0 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ((epred2_0 @ esk5_0)|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0)|(epred1_0 @ esk3_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk3_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ((epred2_0 @ esk5_0)|((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk4_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk3_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk3_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ((epred2_0 @ esk5_0)|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0)|((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk3_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ((epred2_0 @ esk5_0)|((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk4_0))|((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk3_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ esk3_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk3_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk5_0)|((esk1_0 @ X1)!=(esk2_0))|~((epred1_0 @ X1)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9]), c_0_10])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((((esk1_0 @ esk3_0)=(esk2_0))|(epred2_0 @ esk5_0)|((esk1_0 @ X1)!=(esk2_0))|~((epred1_0 @ X1)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_11]), c_0_12])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ((epred2_0 @ esk5_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk3_0)|(epred1_0 @ esk3_0)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_9]), c_0_10])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, (((esk1_0 @ esk3_0)=(esk2_0))|(epred2_0 @ esk5_0)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_11]), c_0_12])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(((epred2_0 @ esk3_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk5_0)|((esk1_0 @ X1)!=(esk2_0))|~((epred1_0 @ X1)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_15]), c_0_16])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i]:((~((epred2_0 @ X1))|((esk2_0)!=(esk1_0 @ X1))|~((epred2_0 @ X3))|((esk2_0)!=(esk1_0 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ((epred2_0 @ esk5_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk3_0)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_15]), c_0_16])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(((epred2_0 @ esk3_0)|((esk1_0 @ esk5_0)!=(esk2_0))|((esk1_0 @ X1)!=(esk2_0))|~((epred2_0 @ X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((((esk1_0 @ esk3_0)=(esk2_0))|((esk1_0 @ esk5_0)!=(esk2_0))|((esk1_0 @ X1)!=(esk2_0))|~((epred2_0 @ X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_16])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, (((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk5_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0)|(epred1_0 @ esk3_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk3_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, (((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk5_0))|((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk4_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk3_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk3_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ((epred2_0 @ esk3_0)|((esk1_0 @ esk5_0)!=(esk2_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_19])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, (((esk1_0 @ esk3_0)=(esk2_0))|((esk1_0 @ esk5_0)!=(esk2_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_16])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((((esk1_0 @ esk5_0)=(esk2_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk3_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk3_0)|((esk1_0 @ X1)!=(esk2_0))|~((epred1_0 @ X1)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_22]), c_0_23])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((((esk1_0 @ esk5_0)!=(esk2_0))|((esk1_0 @ X1)!=(esk2_0))|~((epred2_0 @ X1)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_24]), c_0_25])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, (((esk1_0 @ esk5_0)=(esk2_0))|(epred2_0 @ esk3_0)|(epred1_0 @ esk3_0)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, c_0_22]), c_0_23])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, ((esk1_0 @ esk5_0)!=(esk2_0)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_24]), c_0_25])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, ((epred1_0 @ esk3_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk3_0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_29])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i]:((~((epred2_0 @ X1))|((esk2_0)!=(esk1_0 @ X1))|~((epred1_0 @ X3))|((esk2_0)!=(esk1_0 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_32, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((((esk1_0 @ esk3_0)!=(esk2_0))|((esk1_0 @ X1)!=(esk2_0))|~((epred1_0 @ X1)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_30]), c_0_31])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, ((epred2_0 @ esk3_0)|((esk1_0 @ esk3_0)!=(esk2_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32, c_0_30])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_34, negated_conjecture, (((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk5_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0)|((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk3_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_35, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((((esk1_0 @ esk3_0)!=(esk2_0))|((esk1_0 @ X1)!=(esk2_0))|~((epred2_0 @ X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_33])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_36, negated_conjecture, (((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk5_0))|((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk4_0))|((esk2_0)=(esk1_0 @ esk3_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_37, negated_conjecture, (((esk1_0 @ esk3_0)=(esk2_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk4_0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_34, c_0_29])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_38, negated_conjecture, ((esk1_0 @ esk3_0)!=(esk2_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35, c_0_33])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_39, negated_conjecture, (((esk1_0 @ esk4_0)=(esk2_0))|((esk1_0 @ esk3_0)=(esk2_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_36])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_40, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ esk4_0), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_37, c_0_38])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_41, negated_conjecture, ((esk1_0 @ esk4_0)=(esk2_0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_39, c_0_38])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_42, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((((esk1_0 @ X1)!=(esk2_0))|~((epred1_0 @ X1)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_40]), c_0_41])])). 0.06/0.34 thf(c_0_43, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42, c_0_40]), c_0_41])]), ['proof']). 0.06/0.34 % SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.06/0.34 % Parsed axioms : 45 0.06/0.34 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.06/0.34 % Initial clauses : 35 0.06/0.34 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 22 0.06/0.34 % Initial clauses in saturation : 13 0.06/0.34 % Processed clauses : 41 0.06/0.34 % ...of these trivial : 0 0.06/0.34 % ...subsumed : 4 0.06/0.34 % ...remaining for further processing : 37 0.06/0.34 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.06/0.34 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.06/0.34 % Backward-subsumed : 23 0.06/0.34 % Backward-rewritten : 0 0.06/0.34 % Generated clauses : 66 0.06/0.34 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 60 0.06/0.34 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.06/0.34 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 11 0.06/0.34 % Paramodulations : 61 0.06/0.34 % Factorizations : 0 0.06/0.34 % NegExts : 0 0.06/0.34 % Equation resolutions : 0 0.06/0.34 % Disequality decompositions : 0 0.06/0.34 % Total rewrite steps : 2 0.06/0.34 % ...of those cached : 0 0.06/0.34 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.06/0.34 % Propositional check models : 0 0.06/0.34 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.06/0.34 % Propositional clauses : 0 0.06/0.34 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.06/0.34 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.06/0.34 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.06/0.34 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.06/0.34 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.06/0.34 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.06/0.34 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.06/0.34 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.06/0.34 % Current number of processed clauses : 9 0.06/0.34 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4 0.06/0.34 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.06/0.34 % Negative unit clauses : 2 0.06/0.34 % Non-unit-clauses : 3 0.06/0.34 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4 0.06/0.34 % ...number of literals in the above : 15 0.06/0.34 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.06/0.34 % Current number of archived clauses : 28 0.06/0.34 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 83 0.06/0.34 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 37 0.06/0.34 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 30 0.06/0.34 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14 0.06/0.34 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.06/0.34 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1 0.06/0.34 % BW rewrite match successes : 1 0.06/0.34 % Condensation attempts : 0 0.06/0.34 % Condensation successes : 0 0.06/0.34 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2805 0.06/0.34 % Search garbage collected termcells : 379 0.06/0.34 0.06/0.34 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.06/0.34 % User time : 0.004 s 0.06/0.34 % System time : 0.001 s 0.06/0.34 % Total time : 0.005 s 0.06/0.34 % Maximum resident set size: 3680 pages 0.06/0.34 0.06/0.34 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.06/0.34 % User time : 0.005 s 0.06/0.34 % System time : 0.004 s 0.06/0.34 % Total time : 0.009 s 0.06/0.34 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages 0.06/0.34 % E exiting 0.06/0.34 EOF